gaming industry in sexism shocker
The weekend just gone was San Diego Comic Con, the annual international gathering for geeks and gamers. EA Games ran a competition to promote their new game, Dante's Inferno; I found out about this courtesy of top geeky news site Ars Technica.
So EA Games had a booth at Comic Con launching the game. The booth was staffed by "booth babes" (what's wrong with "model")? EA Games distributed flyers to Con attendees explaining the rules: to win, you have to "commit an act of lust" with any of the "booth babes" at the Con (i.e. not just the ones staffing the EA Games stall). You take a photo of this "act of lust" and send it in. The "best" photo wins "dinner and a sinful night with two hot babes". The same babes who were staffing the stall? Well, presumably, unless EA Games are stupid enough to offer other companies' models as a prize, as well as bait.
Got that? EA Games are offering the female models in their employ as a sexual prize, with which they reward the sexual harassment (and potentially assault) of not only their own models, but any other unlucky women happening to be staffing booths at the same con. Not only was the most "sinful" photo likely to be rewarded, encouraging contestants to up the ante without reference to the feelings of the anonymous "babe", but each contestant was encouraged to enter as many times as possible.
I've been a "booth babe" (let's leave aside the demeaning qualities of that term for the moment, shall we) - most recently at BoundCon. It's a slightly different job from studio modelling. It's hard work; you're basically a sales rep, in role 24/7 for a whole weekend. Whether you're at the booth or wandering around, you represent your stall and are a portable advertisement. You can't do anything without people gathering to stare and point cameras. You can't go to the toilet without people stopping you to take photos and ask questions, some more polite than others. It's a lot of fun, but being "on" for a whole weekend without a break is demanding, exhausting work, and by the second day you are desperate for some privacy and some comfy, casual clothes.
Modelling does not equal prostitution. I have this argument in endless emails with guys who don't get it - I'm a model and an actress. You hire me to pose and act. Sometimes, posing and acting involves physically interacting with other models and actors. That's cool - they're professionals, and I wouldn't agree to work with them if I didn't trust them, or they didn't have a pile of trustworthy references.
If you hire me, you do not buy the right to touch me. You do not buy the right for your friend to touch me. You do not buy the right to give me to a room full of drunk people and invite them to touch me.
I already have problems with enforcing this boundary. A lot of people still seem to think that "model" is a euphemistic way of saying "call girl". As if the fact that I'm comfortable revealing my body means that I have no right to define my own boundaries; as if looking was the same as touching.
Thanks very fucking much, EA Games. Not only did you sign up your models to a weekend of harassment by leering guys pawing at them and competing for who can create the most "sinful" photo, but you signed every other model at ComicCon up to the same fate. That must put you in a hell of an interesting legal position. Not only that, but by encouraging attendees to objectify and paw your models, you increased the chances that the female attendees of BoundCon would be the victims of harassment.
40% of the gaming market are now female, in a world where women in technology are still massively underrepresented and the objectification of female bodies is endemic in advertising. Even in a best-case scenario where all the models hired by EA Games knew about the contest in advance, consented to it, and were able to enforce their own boundaries during the Con and had the support of EA Games in dealing with any unwanted sexual attention - even if this were also true of every other model working the Con - this is STILL unacceptable.
It sends a message that women are objects to compete with, and prizes to be won. It sends a message that EA Games considers the only audience worth having to be heterosexual males - you know, the male "YOU" in the flyer. Female gamers and queer male gamers don't exist in the misogynistic world of EA Games. Women only exist in the gaming industry to be the scantily-clad sprites on console packaging, the hyper-sexed female characters in the games themselves, or the generic, permanently available "booth babes" who exist only to help male gamers get their rocks off.
Sexual harassment is already a huge problem at Cons - look at the experiences of women at last years' Comic Con, or the Open Source Boob Project at ConFusion. This contest was launched into a culture that is already, famously, not female-friendly. EA Games couldn't have sent a clearer message to women telling them they aren't welcome at conventions unless they're happy being treated like this.
Well, they've lost me as a customer, but since (according to them) female gamers don't exist I'm not sure this news will affect them much. What they do care about is their reputation. If any of you agree with me, you can help by spreading the word about their attitude.
The day after the contest was announced, the games team published a statement on Twitpic, bleating that the competition was "just tongue in cheek" and "it was all done in the spirit of good-natured fun". Anyone fancy a game of misogynist bingo? Not only is this statement not remotely good enough, but you only need to look at the stream of sexist bile in the comments to see why I can't see this ending well.
This contest is insulting to gamers, it's insulting to models, and it's insulting to women. This requires more than a half-hearted "clarification" on a social networking site - it requires a company policy statement apologising for the offense and damage caused by this contest, and detailling the action EA Games intend to take to avoid such overt sexism in their future marketing.
Most of EA's UK PR team are women. If you think there's something wrong here, you should write to them and say so.





You're absolutely right, Pandora.
ReplyDeleteI used to train Victim Support volunteers on boundary issues. There should be no doubt that women doing modelling work of any kind need clearly defined boundaries, and that everyone concerned needs to abide by them.
I hope that the women in question will sue this wretched company for sexual harassment -- and that they will receive heavy damages.
I couldn't agree with you more Pandora. I'm an avid World of Warcraft player and 90% of the women players I know play male characters simply to avoid this type of thing.
ReplyDeleteThis is a terrible situation. It is not only beyond reasonable boundaries for the "Booth Babes" concerned but represents EA insulting a large section of their clientel, who I hope would not approve of this attitude, whether they be male or female.
ReplyDeleteAs we live in a world where money talks and BS walks I will be emailing EA (under my vanilla identity), informing them that no younger members of my family can expect to find any EA products in their Christmas/Birthday gifts, from me.
In todays society one of the strongest votes that you can make is with your wallet/purse/plastic.
Prefectdt
Do you know for a fact that the "top prize" was actually / will actually be awarded? The phraseology suggests to me that that at least might well be a hoax. (As for offering the sexual services of their employees - that's scarcely likely.)
ReplyDeleteNot that I'm in any way offending what was clearly a very misconceived and offensive campaign. But I'd be amazed if there were no safeguards in place to prevent actual instances of sexual harassment. Have any been reported? Is EA being sued by any hostess who has been mistreated? Have the police been involved? Has anyone seen any of the alleged photographs? If the answer to these questions is "no", you'll probably find that the whole thing is a PR hoax - one that may well have backfired. But then all publicity is good publicity, no?
But yes, I absolutely agree that the message it sends out is appalling. And your anger is understandable.
I meant "not in any way defending", of course. I'm certainly offending it!
ReplyDeleteWell, I have to agree with Pet, Montana and Spankedhortic - Pandora you're absolutely right.
ReplyDeleteAs a sometimes amateur glamour photographer, I am acutely aware of the responsibility you have as the hirer of "models".
I would like to touch on the point you made about those who think modelling is prostitution. Firstly please keep e-mailing back those who do - it must be so tempting to either ignore them or to reply with just the one word "Wan*er". The more people who think that, the more ammunition that the current crop of "do-gooders" (for want of a better word or description) has to regulate what consenting adults do for each other.
You obviously enjoy what you do and, though you don’t need me to say it, you do it very well. I think a section from your 6th Dec 08 post “sex work and the right to choose” sums it up well :
“I'm not a prostitute. I don't mean that to sound defensive - there'd be no problem if I was, but it would be misleading to put that name to what I do. But I am a sex worker, just as a stripper or a cam girl or a pro-domme is a sex worker. My business is getting people off - and because this is me, I try to do it as creatively and responsibly as possible. And, of course, to have as much fun as I can get away with while doing so.”
Keep up the good work
Charles
Penny Arcade (a rather big US gaming comic) picked up the story.
ReplyDeletehttp://penny-arcade.com/2009/7/29/
http://penny-arcade.com/comic/2009/7/29
Just thought you'd like to know :)
A female friend called me into one of these conventions a few months ago to sort out an emergency technical issue. At first, I thought it was just the gaming overload, I hate playing computer games and stick to real like but no, for me it was the manipulative exploitation of both sexes - a similar “prize” was up for grabs, I wanted to leave but we had hours to kill. After doing the work bit, we found a quiet corner to take coffee and discussed the wrongs of these events on many levels. Our conclusions: Far more women play these games than men yet the sole marketing is prepubescent male or single middle-aged male fantasy. The sales ladies looked incredible board with the whole proceedings and who could blame them, even the car shows have virtually abandoned this marketing niche. On balance, we felt the men were being more manipulated than the ladies who we hoped were being remunerated adequately for their time although the prize idea seemed incredibly off target. Our final conclusion that we were as guilty as the organisers, patching up their half baked attempt and then sitting on our laptops, preparing our invoice for our services and certainly not undercharging. My friend then showed me some newer fantasy role-play software that is designed for the female role-plays and also second life amateur / professional perspectives with fetish and some BDSM elements. These people have far more of a clue and will, I am sure, prevail.
ReplyDeleteIf the news articles linked by Penny Arcade are anything to go by, then by "act of lust" they meant taking a photograph, and there will be no charges for harrassment because nobody tried to enter the stupid contest.
ReplyDeleteWhoa, this is seriously bad form...
ReplyDeleteOn a rather more amusing note, though, can you imagine what EA's risk assessment for this event must have been like?? A lot of lawyers went home happy after THAT meeting one suspects :-)
For the record, I have actually been a prostitute and am appalled by this. The idea of having my services offered as a prize is just disgusting. Just because I engaged in prostitution doesn't mean that I am somehow just anyone's whore. I never did a client I was even a little bit uncomfortable with and no one ever should.
ReplyDeleteExWhore