performance buzz and snatched moments
Well, we're back. Over the last six years, I have now participated in performances of the Complete Works of Shakespeare (plus some exciting, variously obscure Elizabethan/Restoration extras), which is a pretty cool thing to have done. Even if I did fall asleep in a couple of the plays. I blame the beer.
As ever, performing together has been a real buzz for Tom and I, and despite the usual sleep-deprivation we spent the weekend feeling all connected and loved-up. Privacy is difficult to find at these events, but we managed to snatch some time together on the last afternoon ... I was slightly tipsy, I'd been running around a lot and the building we were staying in was pretty cold, so when the first smack landed on my bare flesh I suddenly became aware of how cold and sweat-damp my skin was. The sting cut through the beer-haze and sparked against the core of love and lust that had been heating every time I watched Tom perform.
Our acting friends are all very handsome, in a delightful variety of ways, and there's a group current of flirtation and sexual energy which is rarely acted on but delightful to bask in all the same. It provides a sort of pool we all draw from. But most of the weekend, I only had eyes for Tom. At one point, after one of the plays, I got him alone in our room and ran my hands over his shoulders, his muscular neck, the dark body hair just peeking out of his open-necked poet shirt. "Every time you've worn one something like this I have wanted to run my hands over you," I purred.
"I know," he smiled, "that's why I wear them."
"But I'm looking at you and lusting and you're all I'm in character and busy acting, I'm ignoring you!"
His grin broadened. "I know." He was right: it did make it hotter.
So yeah, that was nice: not a long spanking, but enough to get my attention. I asked for it fairly blatantly, undressing in front of him and bending non-too-subtly over the bed to look for something. And the sex that followed was urgent and sweaty with one of his hands holding my hip and the other wrapped around my throat.
--
Since I got back I've been working and sleeping and spending some quality time with D., which was just as sexy, but (mostly thanks to my sleep deprivation) we skipped the spanking part, so I won't go into detail. I've been catching up on the blogposts I've missed, and I have a few things I want to repost, but since this has been about my men, so far, I just want to highlight a comment Indy made on a post of Graham's:
I think I can describe just about every male top I know in the scene as a Daddy, Schoolmaster, or Cowboy, though a couple can pull off more than one category.
If any of you haven't read Indy's mind-opening post The Cowboy and the Schoolmaster, go and do so now. The post was fascinating, but that comment just made me blink because I really can't think of any exceptions. I am, of course, inclined to ascribe this to cultural trends/conditioning rather than saying anything about the fundamental nature of male tops. I suspect the tropes are different in different times and cultures, but in the West, in recent history, those three seem to basically sum it up. I would say that Tom is half Schoolmaster and half Cowboy. D. is pure Cowboy ;)
As I commented on Graham's post, it leaves me wondering what the categories would be for dominant women (male and female switches are a different ballpark, I think). I suggested the Mummy, the Schoolmistress and the Dark Queen (or however you would describe the elegant, cruel goddess type). Governess, Nurse and Nanny should be in there as well, but I think you can kind of divide those between Mummy and Schoolmistress. I'm not sure, though - my experience with female tops is only just beginning, so I'm not the best person to comment. If you agree, disagree or have better suggestions, please do add your thoughts to the discussions on Graham and Indy's blogs.





I rather thought, at one point, your eyes were rather firmly on me. Shame really, when Tom was especially hot in that play! I have thoughts on the female-top-archetypes thing; have you read 'The Mistress Manual' by Mistress Lorelei? I bought it from Sh! years ago; it's all F/m and very domestic discipline rather than 'leather' towards which I have leanings, but it makes a point of listing archetypes. Can't find it this moment or I'd type them up, but I know it has Nurse and Governess, and lists Queen and Goddess separately.
ReplyDelete(I felt I needed a name to use here, and 'March' seemed suitably... androgynous. Hope you don't mind. I might blog under it if I think of anything to say.)
Acting is so... galvanising. I'm full of envy.
ReplyDeleteOver the last six years, I have now participated in performances of the Complete Works of Shakespeare (plus some exciting, variously obscure Elizabethan/Restoration extras), which is a pretty cool thing to have done.
ReplyDeleteYes, that is pretty cool.
March - My eyes were on you at more than one point, beautiful :) Forgive my lazy late-night prose. In fact I think I might have missed certain amount of Tom's hotness while cuddled up to you ...
ReplyDeleteOf course, in many ways our group is massively incestuous and my comment about the sexual energy being rarely acted on is total bollocks. I'm more thinking about the particular energy of this annual weekend, which doesn't tend to contain much actual bedswapping, but does include lots of flirting and nakedness and intimacy. Outside that particular context, I am well aware that bedswapping within the group is rather more common!
I haven't read the Mistress Manual, but I think I might like to. Listing Queen and Goddess separately makes sense to me, too. Do you think there are more female top types than male? I mean, that list of three types for men is very reductionist - in some ways D isn't a cowboy, for instance, because he's not rugged and patriarchal and all "now, little missy, I'm going to bring you down a peg or two". But our discipline dynamic is informal, playful, adult and sexualised. And he does own a pair of cowboy boots. And a hat. (Which I may well try to get him to spank me in now we've had this conversation.)
So, yeah, I'm sure you could expand the male list as well, but those three roughly cover most of them. I don't know if the female types are actually more complex, or if I'm just less familiar with them.
Adele - well, as previously discussed, you are very welcome to come and act for me whenever you fancy it :)
N Craig - none of them were actual proper productions, I hasten to add, just private geekery, but it's been amazingly rewarding!
I think there are certainly more male types around, though those are three common and readily-understood possibilities. I think there's a possibility somewhere which has the formality and detachment of the Schoolmaster without the attached age and status difference; an owner/trainer idea?
ReplyDeleteAs for women, I wouldn't want to say there were more options than for men, but I might be able to come up with more off the top of my head. Lorelei lists five (I've found the book - it was in the 'for evil scheming' pile which has been by my bed since coming home) which are Nursemaid ('diapers' and nursery ageplay), Governess (schoolroom discipline), Queen ('sissy maid' games, petticoat punishment), Amazon (bondage, discipline and humiliation) and Goddess (body worship, exaltation of the Female). I've mostly taken the descriptions from her chapter headings.
These are rather more specific than the male types mentioned here as these identify particular activities for each fantasy type. Some rather preclude spanking - the Goddess, for example. And they are heavily roleplay-requiring, whereas you could make use of an informal and take-charge style of topping, like a Cowboy, without pretending to be one. These also aren't much good for thinking about girl-girl activities, or if one is uncomfortable with feminisation.
I think, for example, you can have a girl version of Daddy, nurturing but tough and perhaps rather butch (this may be one place I'm coming from. Have I spent too long reading 'Coming to Power'?). A Mummy would have to be more feminine - these are stereotypes we're talking about, after all.
I'm rambling and will stop - but I'll keep thinking about it. Out of interest, why do you see switches as a separate thing entirely?